
Heaven round
Earth square
It is, by all accounts, difficult to know where to begin. One reads and peruses what is on offer on any given topic and finds, too often, there has been an oversight of sorts (or too little of it if we are to take its alternate meaning). And every now and then one encounters a writer who’s able to distinguish from what’s read something extraordinary — writing that is in and of itself a distinguished piece of literature.
Some people find this simple. It is simply their way. The way they work. The way of their literary nature. I am not one of them.
For me, the work is one of re-search and reading of a kind that spokes of weaving and whittling more so than illustrating or illuminating the past inclination to be understood. I’m more likely to quote great swathes than to scalpel citations and then masterfully re-con-figure what once was into new meaning.
I’m an archivist, of sorts. I seek to honour the source, to privilege the meanings presented, and to gather to me a vast depth of knowledge.
My journey to this phrase Heaven Round Earth Square is reminiscent of many of my discoveries. Part accident. Part following. All intuitive.
I think it began, if I am remembering correctly, with an expedition into images of Gaia — trying to find one to most faithfully represent my project at the time — whence I came upon this image:

Something about it spoke to me.
It spoke to me of order and chaos, of beauty in original orientations, and of a tying together that unravelled the tightly knit modernist pattern that seeks the comparative reading of all it encounters.
Nature un.Folding
I like nature. It’s un.knowable. It’s edgeless and indiscernible from ‘other(-ing)’.